[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55C70925.2000306@amd.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2015 15:02:45 +0700
From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>,
Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@...aro.org>,
"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Wei Huang <wei@...hat.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/10] PCI: ACPI: Bind GIC MSI frame to PCI host bridge
Hi Marc,
On 8/4/15 21:04, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 29/07/15 11:08, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>
>>
>> This patch introduces pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain(), which queries
>> a GIC MSI irq-domain token and use it to retrieve an irq_domain with
>> DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_MSI bus type, and bind it to PCI host-bridge.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>
>> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/pci/probe.c | 3 +++
>> include/linux/pci-acpi.h | 4 ++++
>> 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
>> index 314a625..5f11653 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
>> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>>
>> #include <linux/delay.h>
>> #include <linux/init.h>
>> +#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
>> #include <linux/pci.h>
>> #include <linux/pci_hotplug.h>
>> #include <linux/module.h>
>> @@ -16,6 +17,7 @@
>> #include <linux/pci-acpi.h>
>> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>> #include <linux/pm_qos.h>
>> +#include <acpi/acpi_gic.h>
>> #include "pci.h"
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -681,6 +683,22 @@ static bool pci_acpi_bus_match(struct device *dev)
>> return dev_is_pci(dev);
>> }
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN
>> +struct irq_domain *pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus)
>> +{
>> + struct irq_domain *d = NULL;
>> + void *token = acpi_gic_get_msi_token(&bus->dev);
>
> Do you see why I positively *hate* having hardware details in generic
> layers? They propagate everywhere...
>
>> +
>> + if (token)
>> + d = irq_find_matching_host(token, DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_MSI);
>> +
>> + if (!d)
>> + pr_debug("Fail to find domain for MSI\n");
>> +
>> + return d;
>> +}
>> +#endif /*CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN*/
>> +
>> static struct acpi_bus_type acpi_pci_bus = {
>> .name = "PCI",
>> .match = pci_acpi_bus_match,
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
>> index a7afeac..8c1204c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
>> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>> #include <linux/module.h>
>> #include <linux/cpumask.h>
>> #include <linux/pci-aspm.h>
>> +#include <linux/pci-acpi.h>
>> #include <asm-generic/pci-bridge.h>
>> #include "pci.h"
>>
>> @@ -670,6 +671,8 @@ static struct irq_domain *pci_host_bridge_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus)
>> * should be called from here.
>> */
>> d = pci_host_bridge_of_msi_domain(bus);
>> + if (!d)
>> + d = pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain(bus);
>>
>> return d;
>> }
>> diff --git a/include/linux/pci-acpi.h b/include/linux/pci-acpi.h
>> index a965efa..766d045 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/pci-acpi.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/pci-acpi.h
>> @@ -77,6 +77,8 @@ static inline void acpiphp_remove_slots(struct pci_bus *bus) { }
>> static inline void acpiphp_check_host_bridge(struct acpi_device *adev) { }
>> #endif
>>
>> +struct irq_domain *pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus);
>> +
>> extern const u8 pci_acpi_dsm_uuid[];
>> #define DEVICE_LABEL_DSM 0x07
>> #define RESET_DELAY_DSM 0x08
>> @@ -85,6 +87,8 @@ extern const u8 pci_acpi_dsm_uuid[];
>> #else /* CONFIG_ACPI */
>> static inline void acpi_pci_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) { }
>> static inline void acpi_pci_remove_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) { }
>> +static inline struct irq_domain *
>> +pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus) { return NULL; }
>> #endif /* CONFIG_ACPI */
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI
>>
>
> Once you solve the HW abstraction issue, this will be OK.
>
> Thanks,
>
> M.
>
Ok. Thanks,
Suravee
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists