linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 6/6] block: loop: support DIO & AIO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACVXFVOdc5GYrgUXGarosc5AGNvJbsGG+i=R5o+NDKkQHGwFoQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 9 Aug 2015 10:27:14 -0400
From:	Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@...cle.com>,
	Zach Brown <zab@...bo.net>,
	Maxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@...allels.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 6/6] block: loop: support DIO & AIO

On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 09, 2015 at 09:04:32AM -0400, Ming Lei wrote:
>> Now the logical block size of loop is 512byte, but the sector size of
>> backing device may be 4K, so we can't do 512 byte algined direct
>> I/O to the filesystem in this situation.
>>
>> With runtime switch to buffered I/O we can fix this problem, but
>> most of times it won't fall in this case.
>
> The right way to handle this case is to not allow direct I/O at all,
> you'll be constantly switching between direct and buffered I/O
> otherwise, which is a bad idea.

In theory we should not allow dio for this case, but in reality,
as Dave Chinner mentioned, all buffered I/O and normal dio
are page aligned, so we can make most of sane applications
benefited from this patch, and for few insane applications,
frequent swich between buffered I/O and direct I/O shouldn't
be very bad too since draining dio is just like batched sync I/O.

>
>> For non-512 byte sector size of backing device, it is needed as
>> I described above.
>
> If the backing device sector size is smaller than that of the loop

I guess you mean bigger? Suppose the backing device sector
size is 256(smaller), direct I/O should be used without problem.

> device you should not allow direct I/O as you will be switching forth
> and back ue to the IO patterns all the time.


Thanks,
Ming
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/