lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 10 Aug 2015 12:28:17 +0530
From:	Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kernel@...inux.com, Devicetree List <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] mailbox: dt-bindings: Add shared [driver <=>
 device tree] defines

On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> This header is currently only used for defines pertaining to data
> direction i.e. Rx, Tx or Loopback.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> ---
>  include/dt-bindings/mailbox/mailbox.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/mailbox/mailbox.h
>
> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/mailbox/mailbox.h b/include/dt-bindings/mailbox/mailbox.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..82e929a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/mailbox/mailbox.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
> +/*
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __MAILBOX_CONTROLLER_DT_BINDINGS_H
> +#define __MAILBOX_CONTROLLER_DT_BINDINGS_H
> +
> +#define MBOX_TX                0x1
> +#define MBOX_RX                0x2
> +#define MBOX_LOOPBACK  (MBOX_RX | MBOX_TX)
> +
Not sure I understand 'loopback'.  Does it mean h/w has some
'loopback' mode for testing purposes? Or it simply means the
controller can send as well as receive messages?

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ