lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150810071900.GA5073@bgram>
Date:	Mon, 10 Aug 2015 16:19:00 +0900
From:	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
To:	Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@....com>
Cc:	jlayton@...chiereds.net, bfields@...ldses.org, vbabka@...e.cz,
	iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, mst@...hat.com,
	koct9i@...il.com, aquini@...hat.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Gioh Kim <gurugio@...mail.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm/compaction: enable mobile-page migration

On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 07:43:09PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hi Gioh,
> 
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 05:35:17PM +0900, Gioh Kim wrote:
> > From: Gioh Kim <gurugio@...mail.net>
> > 
> > Add framework to register callback functions and check page mobility.
> > There are some modes for page isolation so that isolate interface
> > has arguments of page address and isolation mode while putback
> > interface has only page address as argument.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@....com>
> > Acked-by: Rafael Aquini <aquini@...hat.com>
> > ---
> >  fs/proc/page.c                         |  3 ++
> >  include/linux/compaction.h             | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/linux/fs.h                     |  2 +
> >  include/linux/page-flags.h             | 19 ++++++++
> >  include/uapi/linux/kernel-page-flags.h |  1 +
> >  5 files changed, 105 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/proc/page.c b/fs/proc/page.c
> > index 7eee2d8..a4f5a00 100644
> > --- a/fs/proc/page.c
> > +++ b/fs/proc/page.c
> > @@ -146,6 +146,9 @@ u64 stable_page_flags(struct page *page)
> >  	if (PageBalloon(page))
> >  		u |= 1 << KPF_BALLOON;
> >  
> > +	if (PageMobile(page))
> > +		u |= 1 << KPF_MOBILE;
> > +
> 
> Need a new page flag for non-LRU page migration?
> I am worry that we don't have empty slot for page flag on 32-bit.
> 
> Aha, see SetPageMobile below. You use _mapcount.
> It seems to be work for non-LRU pages but unfortunately, zsmalloc
> already have used that field as own purpose so there is no room
> for it.

Gioh, I just sent a patch which zsmalloc doesn't use page->mapping
and _mapcount so I think zsmalloc could support compaction with your
patchset. Although zsmalloc can support compaction with it, I still
don't think it's a good that driver have to mark pages mobile via
_mapcount.

I hope you can find another way.

Thanks.

> 
> 
> >  	u |= kpf_copy_bit(k, KPF_LOCKED,	PG_locked);
> >  
> >  	u |= kpf_copy_bit(k, KPF_SLAB,		PG_slab);
> > diff --git a/include/linux/compaction.h b/include/linux/compaction.h
> > index aa8f61c..f693072 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/compaction.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/compaction.h
> > @@ -1,6 +1,9 @@
> >  #ifndef _LINUX_COMPACTION_H
> >  #define _LINUX_COMPACTION_H
> >  
> > +#include <linux/page-flags.h>
> > +#include <linux/pagemap.h>
> > +
> >  /* Return values for compact_zone() and try_to_compact_pages() */
> >  /* compaction didn't start as it was deferred due to past failures */
> >  #define COMPACT_DEFERRED	0
> > @@ -51,6 +54,70 @@ extern void compaction_defer_reset(struct zone *zone, int order,
> >  				bool alloc_success);
> >  extern bool compaction_restarting(struct zone *zone, int order);
> >  
> > +static inline bool mobile_page(struct page *page)
> > +{
> > +	return page->mapping &&	(PageMobile(page) || PageBalloon(page));
> 
> 
> What's the locking rule to test mobile_page?
> Why we need such many checking?
> 
> Why we need PageBalloon check?
> You are trying to make generic abstraction for non-LRU page to migrate
> but PageBalloon check in here breaks your goal.
> 
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline bool isolate_mobilepage(struct page *page, isolate_mode_t mode)
> > +{
> > +	bool ret = false;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Avoid burning cycles with pages that are yet under __free_pages(),
> > +	 * or just got freed under us.
> > +	 *
> > +	 * In case we 'win' a race for a mobile page being freed under us and
> > +	 * raise its refcount preventing __free_pages() from doing its job
> > +	 * the put_page() at the end of this block will take care of
> > +	 * release this page, thus avoiding a nasty leakage.
> > +	 */
> 
> Good.
> 
> > +	if (unlikely(!get_page_unless_zero(page)))
> > +		goto out;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * As mobile pages are not isolated from LRU lists, concurrent
> > +	 * compaction threads can race against page migration functions
> > +	 * as well as race against the releasing a page.
> 
> How can it race with releasing a page?
> We already get refcount above.
> 
> Do you mean page->mapping tearing race?
> If so, zsmalloc should be chaned to hold a lock.
> 
> 
> > +	 *
> > +	 * In order to avoid having an already isolated mobile page
> > +	 * being (wrongly) re-isolated while it is under migration,
> > +	 * or to avoid attempting to isolate pages being released,
> > +	 * lets be sure we have the page lock
> > +	 * before proceeding with the mobile page isolation steps.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (unlikely(!trylock_page(page)))
> > +		goto out_putpage;
> > +
> > +	if (!(mobile_page(page) && page->mapping->a_ops->isolatepage))
> > +		goto out_not_isolated;
> 
> I cannot know how isolate_mobilepage is called by upper layer
> because this patch doesn't include it.
> Anyway, why we need such many checks to prove it's mobile page?
> 
> mobile_page() {
> 	page->mapping && (PageMobile(page) || PageBalloon(page));
> }
> 
> Additionally, added page->mapping->a_ops->isolatepage check
> 
> Is it possible that a non-LRU page's address space provides
> only page->maping->migratepage without isolate/putback?
> 
> Couldn't we make it simple like this?
> 
>         page->mapping && page->mapping->migratepage
> 
> So, couldn't we make mobile_page like this
> 
> PageMobile(struct page *page)
> {
>         VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageLocked(page), page);
>         VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageLRU(page), page);
> 
>         return page->mapping && page->mapping->migratepage;
> }
> 
> It will save _mapcount of struct page.
> 
> > +	ret = page->mapping->a_ops->isolatepage(page, mode);
> > +	if (!ret)
> > +		goto out_not_isolated;
> > +	unlock_page(page);
> > +	return ret;
> > +
> > +out_not_isolated:
> > +	unlock_page(page);
> > +out_putpage:
> > +	put_page(page);
> > +out:
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void putback_mobilepage(struct page *page)
> > +{
> > +	/*
> > +	 * 'lock_page()' stabilizes the page and prevents races against
> 
> What does it mean 'stabilize'?
> Clear comment is always welcome rather than vague word.
> 
> > +	 * concurrent isolation threads attempting to re-isolate it.
> > +	 */
> > +	lock_page(page);
> > +	if (page->mapping && page->mapping->a_ops->putbackpage)
> > +		page->mapping->a_ops->putbackpage(page);
> > +	unlock_page(page);
> > +	/* drop the extra ref count taken for mobile page isolation */
> > +	put_page(page);
> > +}
> >  #else
> >  static inline unsigned long try_to_compact_pages(gfp_t gfp_mask,
> >  			unsigned int order, int alloc_flags,
> > @@ -83,6 +150,19 @@ static inline bool compaction_deferred(struct zone *zone, int order)
> >  	return true;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static inline bool mobile_page(struct page *page)
> > +{
> > +	return false;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline bool isolate_mobilepage(struct page *page, isolate_mode_t mode)
> > +{
> > +	return false;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void putback_mobilepage(struct page *page)
> > +{
> > +}
> >  #endif /* CONFIG_COMPACTION */
> >  
> >  #if defined(CONFIG_COMPACTION) && defined(CONFIG_SYSFS) && defined(CONFIG_NUMA)
> > diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> > index a0653e5..2cc4b24 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> > @@ -396,6 +396,8 @@ struct address_space_operations {
> >  	 */
> >  	int (*migratepage) (struct address_space *,
> >  			struct page *, struct page *, enum migrate_mode);
> > +	bool (*isolatepage) (struct page *, isolate_mode_t);
> > +	void (*putbackpage) (struct page *);
> >  	int (*launder_page) (struct page *);
> >  	int (*is_partially_uptodate) (struct page *, unsigned long,
> >  					unsigned long);
> > diff --git a/include/linux/page-flags.h b/include/linux/page-flags.h
> > index f34e040..abef145 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/page-flags.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/page-flags.h
> > @@ -582,6 +582,25 @@ static inline void __ClearPageBalloon(struct page *page)
> >  	atomic_set(&page->_mapcount, -1);
> >  }
> >  
> > +#define PAGE_MOBILE_MAPCOUNT_VALUE (-255)
> > +
> > +static inline int PageMobile(struct page *page)
> > +{
> > +	return atomic_read(&page->_mapcount) == PAGE_MOBILE_MAPCOUNT_VALUE;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void __SetPageMobile(struct page *page)
> > +{
> > +	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(atomic_read(&page->_mapcount) != -1, page);
> > +	atomic_set(&page->_mapcount, PAGE_MOBILE_MAPCOUNT_VALUE);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void __ClearPageMobile(struct page *page)
> > +{
> > +	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageMobile(page), page);
> > +	atomic_set(&page->_mapcount, -1);
> > +}
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * If network-based swap is enabled, sl*b must keep track of whether pages
> >   * were allocated from pfmemalloc reserves.
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kernel-page-flags.h b/include/uapi/linux/kernel-page-flags.h
> > index a6c4962..d50d9e8 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/kernel-page-flags.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/kernel-page-flags.h
> > @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
> >  #define KPF_THP			22
> >  #define KPF_BALLOON		23
> >  #define KPF_ZERO_PAGE		24
> > +#define KPF_MOBILE		25
> >  
> >  
> >  #endif /* _UAPILINUX_KERNEL_PAGE_FLAGS_H */
> > -- 
> > 2.1.4
> > 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ