linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm/hwpoison: fix fail to split THP w/ refcount held

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BLU437-SMTP7349274677DC2936F6E47180700@phx.gbl>
Date:	Mon, 10 Aug 2015 17:15:14 +0800
From:	Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>
To:	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm/hwpoison: fix fail to split THP w/ refcount held



On 8/10/15 4:50 PM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 04:29:18PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>> Hi Naoya,
>>
>> On 8/10/15 4:10 PM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 02:32:30PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>>>> THP pages will get a refcount in madvise_hwpoison() w/ MF_COUNT_INCREASED
>>>> flag, however, the refcount is still held when fail to split THP pages.
>>>>
>>>> Fix it by reducing the refcount of THP pages when fail to split THP.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>
>>> It seems that the same conditional put_page() would be added to
>>> "soft offline: %#lx page already poisoned" branch too, right?
>> PageHWPoison() is just called before the soft_offline_page() in
>> madvise_hwpoion(). I think the PageHWPosion()
>> check in soft_offline_page() makes more sense for the other
>> soft_offline_page() callsites which don't have the
>> refcount held.
> What I am worried is a race like below:
>
>   CPU0                              CPU1
>
>   madvise_hwpoison
>   get_user_pages_fast
>   PageHWPoison check (false)
>                                     memory_failure
>                                     TestSetPageHWPoison
>   soft_offline_page
>   PageHWPoison check (true)
>   return -EBUSY (without put_page)

Indeed, there is a race even through it is rared happen.

>
> It's rare and madvise_hwpoison() is testing feature, so this never causes
> real problems in production systems, so it's not a big deal.
> My suggestion is maybe just for code correctness thing ...

Thanks for your proposal, I will add your suggestion in v2 and post out
after we have a uniform solution for patch 2/2. :)

Regards,
Wanpeng Li

>
> Thanks,
> Naoya Horiguchi

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/