[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrVMSWnHkvjXH8zc3nKuTarADvBO=YEof4dkAzHsmc6jKg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2015 19:12:23 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [tip:perf/core] perf/x86: Add an MSR PMU driver
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 1:34 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 05:59:43PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 08:30:08AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 8:21 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>> > > On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 08:39:27PM +0000, Liang, Kan wrote:
>> > > - default:
>> > > - err = -ENOTSUPP;
>> > > + if (!msr[i].test() || rdmsrl_safe(msr[i].msr, &val))
>> > > + msr[i].attr = NULL;
>> >
>> > IIRC rdmsrl_safe literally never fails under QEMU TCG, and I'm not
>>
>> *sigh* the borkage never stops does it :-(
>>
>> > entirely sure what happens under KVM if emulation kicks in. It might
>> > pay to keep the model check for the non-architectural stuff, or at
>> > least check for a nonzero return value.
>>
>> Of course, 0 might be a valid value.. Esp. for the SMI counter.
>
> This then..
>
LGTM on brief inspection.
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists