[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1439201551.624344350@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 12:12:31 +0200
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "Ralf Baechle" <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Bernard Pidoux" <f6bvp@...e.fr>
Subject: [PATCH 3.2 044/110] NET: ROSE: Don't dereference NULL neighbour
pointer.
3.2.71-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
commit d496f7842aada20c61e6044b3395383fa972872c upstream.
A ROSE socket doesn't necessarily always have a neighbour pointer so check
if the neighbour pointer is valid before dereferencing it.
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
Tested-by: Bernard Pidoux <f6bvp@...e.fr>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
net/rose/af_rose.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/net/rose/af_rose.c
+++ b/net/rose/af_rose.c
@@ -195,7 +195,8 @@ static void rose_kill_by_device(struct n
if (rose->device == dev) {
rose_disconnect(s, ENETUNREACH, ROSE_OUT_OF_ORDER, 0);
- rose->neighbour->use--;
+ if (rose->neighbour)
+ rose->neighbour->use--;
rose->device = NULL;
}
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists