[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150810113907.GH8857@zion.uk.xensource.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 12:39:07 +0100
From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
To: Julien Grall <julien.grall@...rix.com>
CC: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>, <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <ian.campbell@...rix.com>,
<stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 18/20] net/xen-netback: Make it running on 64KB page
granularity
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 10:57:48AM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
[...]
>
> >>+ info.page = page;
> >>+ gnttab_foreach_grant_in_range(page, offset, bytes,
> >>+ xenvif_gop_frag_copy_grant,
> >>+ &info);
> >
> >Looks like I need to at least wait until the API is settle before giving
> >my ack.
> >
> >> size -= bytes;
> >>+ offset = 0;
> >
> >This looks wrong. Should be offset += bytes.
>
> With the new implementation of the loop, each iteration will be on a
> different page.
> So only the first page has an offset different than zero.
>
> >
> >>
> >>- /* Next frame */
> >>- if (offset == PAGE_SIZE && size) {
> >>+ /* Next page */
> >>+ if (size) {
> >> BUG_ON(!PageCompound(page));
> >> page++;
> >>- offset = 0;
> >
> >And this should not be deleted, I think.
> >
> >What is the reason for changing offset calculation? I think there is
> >still compound page when using 64K page.
>
> The compound pages are still working ... gnttab_foreach_grant_in_range is
> called once per page. So the offset can be reset to 0 every time. No need to
> add code which would make the result less clear.
>
> We only need to know if the size is not 0 to get the next page.
>
> The patch may not be clear enough to see it's working so I've copied the
> result loop below:
>
> while (size > 0) {
> BUG_ON(offset >= PAGE_SIZE);
>
> bytes = PAGE_SIZE - offset;
> if (bytes > size)
> bytes = size;
>
> info.page = page;
> gnttab_foreach_grant_in_range(page, offset, bytes,
> xenvif_gop_frag_copy_grant,
> &info);
> size -= bytes;
> offset = 0;
>
> /* Next page */
> if (size) {
> BUG_ON(!PageCompound(page));
> page++;
> }
> }
>
Right. That doesn't mean the original code was wrong or anything. But I
don't want to bikeshed about this.
Please add a comment saying that offset is always 0 starting from second
iteration because the gnttab_foreach_grant_in_range makes sure we handle
one page in one go.
Wei.
> Regards,
>
> --
> Julien Grall
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists