lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55C8ABD7.5010205@linaro.org>
Date:	Mon, 10 Aug 2015 14:49:11 +0100
From:	Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
CC:	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, robdclark@...il.com,
	David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/5] drm/msm/hdmi: make use of standard gpio properties.



On 10/08/15 14:26, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 02:15:18PM +0100, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/08/15 13:38, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 12:59:34PM +0100, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>>>> This patch modifies the driver to support standard gpio properties along
>>>> with deprecated properties. This will help us upstream and cleanup the
>>>> non-standard properties over the time.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
>>>> ---
>>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/hdmi/hdmi.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>>>>   1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/hdmi/hdmi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/hdmi/hdmi.c
>>>> index 8145362..e918889 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/hdmi/hdmi.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/hdmi/hdmi.c
>>>> @@ -339,19 +339,34 @@ static const struct of_device_id dt_match[] = {
>>>>   };
>>>>
>>>>   #ifdef CONFIG_OF
>>>> +/* This code will be removed once we move to gpiod based calls */
>>>
>>> Why don't you do this now instead of duplicating what is essentially
>>> already implemented in gpiolib?
>>>
>> One of the thing that Rob asked in his comments
>> (http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg437675.html) was to retain the
>> support for old devices, moving to gpiod ATM would break such devices as
>> they are still using legacy gpiolib and its naming.
>>
>>
>> If Rob is ok to drop gpio properties which does not have "-gpio" or "-gpios"
>> suffix then we can get rid of this function all together.
>
> If you make the switch to gpiod_*() APIs you'll get this for free.
> There's really no need for having a duplicate of what gpiod_get()
> already does for you.
>
Yes, you are right, my memory was over written on friday by looking at 
of_find_gpio() for long :-)

AFAIK, gpiod_get would also request the gpios so we might want to remove 
the additional gpio requests in the hdmi_connector.c too.

I will give that a try once again..

--srini
> Thierry
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ