[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55C8AEDC.90603@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 15:02:04 +0100
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] sched: Migrate sched to use new tick dependency
mask model
Hi,
On 04/08/15 08:41, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 07:30:32PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>>> But you've forgotten about SCHED_DEADLINE, we count those in:
>>> rq->dl.dl_nr_running.
>>
>> Indeed. Hmm, there is no preemption between SCHED_DEALINE tasks, right?
>> So I can treat it like SCHED_FIFO.
>
> Sadly no. Even though EDF has static job priority (once a job is
> activated its priority doesn't change anymore) DEADLINE also has a CBS
> component and that needs the tick regardless, even with a single task.
>
> So any deadline task running means we cannot stop the tick.
Well, couldn't we stop it when we use hrtick? As start_hrtick_dl() sets
the hrtick to fire at tasks runtime depletion instant.
Thanks,
- Juri
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists