[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1471794.hTPSfQy61b@sifl>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 12:22:15 -0400
From: Paul Moore <pmoore@...hat.com>
To: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-audit@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sgrubb@...hat.com, eparis@...hat.com, peter@...3.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V10] fixup: audit: implement audit by executable
On Saturday, August 08, 2015 10:20:25 AM Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/audit_watch.c b/kernel/audit_watch.c
> index 1255dbf..656c7e9 100644
> --- a/kernel/audit_watch.c
> +++ b/kernel/audit_watch.c
> @@ -540,8 +540,14 @@ int audit_dupe_exe(struct audit_krule *new, struct
> audit_krule *old)
>
> int audit_exe_compare(struct task_struct *tsk, struct audit_fsnotify_mark
> *mark) {
> - unsigned long ino = tsk->mm->exe_file->f_inode->i_ino;
> - dev_t dev = tsk->mm->exe_file->f_inode->i_sb->s_dev;
> -
> + struct file *exe_file;
> + unsigned long ino;
> + dev_t dev;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + exe_file = rcu_dereference(tsk->mm->exe_file);
This line is triggering a sparse error on my system:
# make C=1 M=kernel
...
CHECK kernel/audit_watch.c
kernel/audit_watch.c:548:20: error: incompatible types in comparison
expression (different address spaces)
For the record I'm using gcc v4.9.3 and sparse v0.5.0.
> + ino = exe_file->f_inode->i_ino;
> + dev = exe_file->f_inode->i_sb->s_dev;
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> return audit_mark_compare(mark, ino, dev);
> }
--
paul moore
security @ redhat
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists