linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] gpio: Allow compile test of GPIO consumers if !GPIOLIB

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVOeXCoYN_99bqN_MkmXuXL1nhcmK3Zf4kAi01F8WeHPw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 10 Aug 2015 18:23:52 +0200
From:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	Marcel Selhorst <tpmdd@...horst.net>,
	Noralf Trønnes <noralf@...nnes.org>,
	Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
	Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
	Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] gpio: Allow compile test of GPIO consumers if !GPIOLIB

Hi Johannes,

On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 6:01 PM, Johannes Berg
<johannes@...solutions.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-08-02 at 11:07 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> Thanks for applying!
>
> Did you expect the series to get applied somewhere (GPIO tree, if
> there's such a thing?), or the single patches to go through the
> relevant other trees?
>
> Fine with me either way, but it'd be good to know so we don't have the
> patches twice :)

I'd like the individual subsystem maintainers to apply the respective
patches. Sorry for being unclear.

Thanks!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/