[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150810003513.GB26074@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 09:35:13 +0900
From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] zram: fix possible race when checking idle_strm
On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 11:49:04PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hi Joonsoo,
>
> On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 05:03:29PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > Currently, when we enter the wait state due to lack of idle stream,
> > we check idle_strm list without holding the lock in expanding of
> > wait_event define. In this case, some one can see stale value and
> > process could fall into wait state without any upcoming wakeup process.
> > Although I didn't see any error related to this race, it should be fixed.
>
> Long time ago, I wondered about lost wake-up problem and found a article.
>
> http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/8144
>
> >From then, I have thought such issue shouldn't happen if something is
> wrong since then and I believe it's same issue.
>
> Could you point out exact code sequence about the problem you mentioned?
Hello,
I describe exact code sequence in reply of Sergey's mail.
It would fully describe the problem.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists