[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150811060229.GG9678@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 23:02:29 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>, nm@...com,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
khilman@...aro.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] PM / OPP: reuse of_parse_phandle()
On 08/10, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> We already have a better API to get the opp descriptor block's node from
> cpu-node. Lets reuse that instead of creating our own routines for the
> same stuff. That cleans the code a lot.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp.c b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
> index 204c6c945168..1daaa1a418a2 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/opp.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
> /*
> * TODO: Support for multiple OPP tables.
> *
> * There should be only ONE phandle present in "operating-points-v2"
> * property.
> */
> - if (prop->length != sizeof(__be32)) {
> - dev_err(dev, "%s: Invalid opp desc phandle\n", __func__);
> - return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> - }
But we lost this check? Perhaps we can use
of_count_phandle_with_args() to make suer we only have one
phandle?
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists