[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55C99D0D.9050605@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:28:21 +0530
From: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
To: <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: "Franklin S Cooper Jr." <fcooper@...com>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>, <khilman@...prootsystems.com>,
<linux@....linux.org.uk>, <galak@...eaurora.org>,
<ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<pawel.moll@....com>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...t.infradead.org>, <ssantosh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH 3/4] ARM: davinci: Set proper SPI prescale limit
value
On Tuesday 11 August 2015 05:17 AM, Franklin S Cooper Jr. wrote:
>
>
> On 07/24/2015 06:50 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>> On Wednesday 22 July 2015 06:02 PM, Franklin S Cooper Jr wrote:
>>> SPI Davinci driver has been updated to allow SOCs to specify their minimum
>>> prescale value. Update the various SOCs board files that use this driver with
>>> their proper prescaler limit.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Franklin S Cooper Jr <fcooper@...com>
>> Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
>>
>> in case Mark is okay to take it through his tree. It does not clash with
>> anything else I have for mach-davinci.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sekhar
>>
> ping. Patches 1 and 2 have already been pulled into Mark's spi tree and are currently in in linux-next.
Mark, can you apply this patch to your tree as well? Thats the preferred
route for me.
If thats not an option for you, can you confirm that the topic/davinci
branch of your spi tree is an immutable commit I can base my pull
request to ARM-SoC on?
Thanks,
Sekhar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists