[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150811111507.GN16853@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 13:15:07 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] sched/numa: Remove NUMA sched feature
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 04:30:13PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> Variable sched_numa_balancing is available for both CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG
> and !CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG. All code paths now check for
> sched_numa_balancing. Hence remove sched_feat(NUMA).
>
> Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/core.c | 6 ------
> kernel/sched/features.h | 16 ----------------
> 2 files changed, 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 7cbdf44..d02570b 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -2063,12 +2063,6 @@ __read_mostly bool sched_numa_balancing;
> void set_numabalancing_state(bool enabled)
> {
> sched_numa_balancing = enabled;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG
> - if (enabled)
> - sched_feat_set("NUMA");
> - else
> - sched_feat_set("NO_NUMA");
> -#endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG */
> }
Could you at least replace sched_numa_balancing with a static_key
thingy?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists