lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9hhegjakklf.fsf@e105922-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date:	Tue, 11 Aug 2015 14:42:20 +0100
From:	Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@....com>
To:	Javi Merino <javi.merino@....com>
Cc:	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com,
	cywang@...omium.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
	Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] thermal: power_allocator: relax the requirement of a sustainable_power in tzp

Hi Javi,

A few nitpicks and a comment below.

Javi Merino <javi.merino@....com> writes:

> The power allocator governor currently requires that a sustainable power
> is passed as part of the thermal zone's thermal zone parameters.  If
> that parameter is not provided, it doesn't register with the thermal
> zone.
>
> While this parameter is strongly recommended for optimal performance, it
> doesn't need to be mandatory.  Relax the requirement and allow the
> governor to bind to thermal zones that don't provide it by estimating it
> from the cooling devices' power model.
>
> Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
> Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Javi Merino <javi.merino@....com>
> ---
>  drivers/thermal/power_allocator.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c    | 28 ++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/thermal.h           |  6 ++++
>  3 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/power_allocator.c b/drivers/thermal/power_allocator.c
> index 63a448f9d93b..f78836c2da26 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/power_allocator.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/power_allocator.c
> @@ -73,6 +73,39 @@ struct power_allocator_params {
>  };
>  
>  /**
> + * estimate_sustainable_power() - Estimate the sustainable power of a thermal zone
> + * @tz: thermal zone we are operating in
> + *
> + * For thermal zones that don't provide a sustainable_power in their
> + * thermal_zone_params, estimate one.  Calculate it using the minimum
> + * power of all the cooling devices as that gives a valid value that
> + * can give some degree of functionality.  For optimal performance of
> + * this governor, provide a sustainable_power in the thermal zone's
> + * thermal_zone_params.
> + */
> +static u32 estimate_sustainable_power(struct thermal_zone_device *tz)
> +{
> +	u32 sustainable_power = 0;
> +	struct thermal_instance *instance;
> +	struct power_allocator_params *params = tz->governor_data;
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry(instance, &tz->thermal_instances, tz_node) {
> +		struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev = instance->cdev;
> +		u32 min_power;
> +
> +		if (instance->trip != params->trip_max_desired_temperature)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		if (power_actor_get_min_power(cdev, tz, &min_power))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		sustainable_power += min_power;
> +	}
> +
> +	return sustainable_power;
> +}
> +
> +/**
>   * pid_controller() - PID controller
>   * @tz:	thermal zone we are operating in
>   * @current_temp:	the current temperature in millicelsius
> @@ -98,6 +131,7 @@ static u32 pid_controller(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
>  {
>  	s64 p, i, d, power_range;
>  	s32 err, max_power_frac;
> +	u32 sustainable_power;
>  	struct power_allocator_params *params = tz->governor_data;
>  
>  	max_power_frac = int_to_frac(max_allocatable_power);
> @@ -138,8 +172,11 @@ static u32 pid_controller(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
>  
>  	power_range = p + i + d;
>  
> +	sustainable_power = tz->tzp->sustainable_power ?:
> +		estimate_sustainable_power(tz);
> +
>  	/* feed-forward the known sustainable dissipatable power */
> -	power_range = tz->tzp->sustainable_power + frac_to_int(power_range);
> +	power_range = sustainable_power + frac_to_int(power_range);
>  
>  	power_range = clamp(power_range, (s64)0, (s64)max_allocatable_power);
>  
> @@ -418,18 +455,18 @@ static int power_allocator_bind(struct thermal_zone_device *tz)
>  	int ret;
>  	struct power_allocator_params *params;
>  	unsigned long switch_on_temp, control_temp;
> -	u32 temperature_threshold;
> +	u32 sustainable_power, temperature_threshold;
>  
> -	if (!tz->tzp || !tz->tzp->sustainable_power) {
> -		dev_err(&tz->device,
> -			"power_allocator: missing sustainable_power\n");
> +	if (!tz->tzp)
>  		return -EINVAL;
> -	}
>  
>  	params = devm_kzalloc(&tz->device, sizeof(*params), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!params)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> +	if (!tz->tzp->sustainable_power)
> +		dev_warn(&tz->device, "power_allocator: sustainable_power will be estimated\n");
> +
>  	ret = get_governor_trips(tz, params);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		dev_err(&tz->device,
> @@ -448,13 +485,20 @@ static int power_allocator_bind(struct thermal_zone_device *tz)
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto free;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Provide an arbitrary sustainable_power to set the default
> +	 * values of k_po and k_pu.  We can estimate sustainable_power
                                        ^
                                        can not
> +	 * at this point because no cooling devices have been
> +	 * registered yet.  By providing an arbitrary value we get
> +	 * better defaults that setting k_po and k_pu to 0.
                           ^
                           than

> +	 */
> +	sustainable_power = tz->tzp->sustainable_power ?: 2500;
>  	temperature_threshold = control_temp - switch_on_temp;
>  
>  	tz->tzp->k_po = tz->tzp->k_po ?:
> -		int_to_frac(tz->tzp->sustainable_power) / temperature_threshold;
> +		int_to_frac(sustainable_power) / temperature_threshold;
>  	tz->tzp->k_pu = tz->tzp->k_pu ?:
> -		int_to_frac(2 * tz->tzp->sustainable_power) /
> -		temperature_threshold;
> +		int_to_frac(2 * sustainable_power) / temperature_threshold;

As we are being conservative with our estimation of sustainable power
(sum of mins) when it is not explicitly specified, should we be
conservative here and let the proportional terms, k_po and k_pu be zero
as well?

>  	tz->tzp->k_i = tz->tzp->k_i ?: int_to_frac(10) / 1000;
>  	/*
>  	 * The default for k_d and integral_cutoff is 0, so we can
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> index 4ca211be4c0f..d26bc9e6f936 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> @@ -997,6 +997,34 @@ int power_actor_get_max_power(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev,
>  }
>  
>  /**
> + * power_actor_get_min_power() - get the mainimum power that a cdev can consume
> + * @cdev:	pointer to &thermal_cooling_device
> + * @tz:		a valid thermal zone device pointer
> + * @min_power:	pointer in which to store the minimum power
> + *
> + * Calculate the minimum power consumption in milliwats that the
> + * cooling device can currently consume and store it in @min_power.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, -EINVAL if @cdev doesn't support the
> + * power_actor API or -E* on other error.
> + */
> +int power_actor_get_min_power(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev,
> +			      struct thermal_zone_device *tz, u32 *min_power)
> +{
> +	unsigned long max_state;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!cdev_is_power_actor(cdev))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	ret = cdev->ops->get_max_state(cdev, &max_state);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	return cdev->ops->state2power(cdev, tz, max_state, min_power);
> +}
> +
> +/**
>   * power_actor_set_power() - limit the maximum power that a cooling device can consume
>   * @cdev:	pointer to &thermal_cooling_device
>   * @instance:	thermal instance to update
> diff --git a/include/linux/thermal.h b/include/linux/thermal.h
> index 037e9df2f610..f99d934d373a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/thermal.h
> +++ b/include/linux/thermal.h
> @@ -384,6 +384,8 @@ static inline bool cdev_is_power_actor(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev)
>  
>  int power_actor_get_max_power(struct thermal_cooling_device *,
>  			      struct thermal_zone_device *tz, u32 *max_power);
> +int power_actor_get_min_power(struct thermal_cooling_device *,
> +			      struct thermal_zone_device *tz, u32 *min_power);
>  int power_actor_set_power(struct thermal_cooling_device *,
>  			  struct thermal_instance *, u32);
>  struct thermal_zone_device *thermal_zone_device_register(const char *, int, int,
> @@ -419,6 +421,10 @@ static inline bool cdev_is_power_actor(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev)
>  static inline int power_actor_get_max_power(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev,
>  			      struct thermal_zone_device *tz, u32 *max_power)
>  { return 0; }
> +static inline int power_actor_get_min_power(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev,
> +					    struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
> +					    u32 *min_power)
> +{ return -ENODEV; }

Perhaps return 0 like power_actor_get_max_power just above for
consistency.

>  static inline int power_actor_set_power(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev,
>  			  struct thermal_instance *tz, u32 power)
>  { return 0; }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ