[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150811183530.GB14784@jaegeuk-mac02.mot.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 11:35:30 -0700
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
To: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] f2fs: handle error of f2fs_iget correctly
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 06:42:19PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk@...nel.org]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 3:32 AM
> > To: Chao Yu
> > Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> > linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] f2fs: handle error of f2fs_iget correctly
> >
> > Hi Chao,
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 06:41:02PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> > > In recover_orphan_inode, if f2fs_iget failed, we change to report the
> > > error number to its caller instead of bug_on.
> >
> > Let's keep this in order to catch any bugs.
> > Or, is there another issue on this?
>
> f2fs_iget can fail due to a lot of reason, like out of memory, IMO,
> it's better to report such error number to user instead of make kernel
> panic. So how about keeping bug_on when finding no entry for orphan
> inode, otherwise reporting error to caller?
Much better. :)
Thanks,
>
> >From 05068a0068a9d0a60296c492967ef2433ad0e35f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@...sung.com>
> Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 17:58:43 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] f2fs: handle error of f2fs_iget correctly
>
> In recover_orphan_inode, whenever f2fs_iget fail, we will make kernel panic,
> but it's not reasonable, because f2fs_iget can fail due to a lot of reasons
> including out of memory.
>
> So we change error handling method as below:
> a) when finding no entry for the orphan inode, bug_on for catching bugs;
> b) for other reasons, report it to caller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@...sung.com>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 2 +-
> fs/f2fs/super.c | 4 +++-
> 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> index c311176..0958c83 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> @@ -468,22 +468,34 @@ void remove_orphan_inode(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t ino)
> __remove_ino_entry(sbi, ino, ORPHAN_INO);
> }
>
> -static void recover_orphan_inode(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t ino)
> +static int recover_orphan_inode(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t ino)
> {
> - struct inode *inode = f2fs_iget(sbi->sb, ino);
> - f2fs_bug_on(sbi, IS_ERR(inode));
> + struct inode *inode;
> +
> + inode = f2fs_iget(sbi->sb, ino);
> + if (IS_ERR(inode)) {
> + /*
> + * there should be a bug that we can't find the entry
> + * to orphan inode.
> + */
> + f2fs_bug_on(sbi, PTR_ERR(inode) == -ENOENT);
> + return PTR_ERR(inode);
> + }
> +
> clear_nlink(inode);
>
> /* truncate all the data during iput */
> iput(inode);
> + return 0;
> }
>
> -void recover_orphan_inodes(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> +int recover_orphan_inodes(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> {
> block_t start_blk, orphan_blocks, i, j;
> + int err;
>
> if (!is_set_ckpt_flags(F2FS_CKPT(sbi), CP_ORPHAN_PRESENT_FLAG))
> - return;
> + return 0;
>
> set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_POR_DOING);
>
> @@ -499,14 +511,19 @@ void recover_orphan_inodes(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> orphan_blk = (struct f2fs_orphan_block *)page_address(page);
> for (j = 0; j < le32_to_cpu(orphan_blk->entry_count); j++) {
> nid_t ino = le32_to_cpu(orphan_blk->ino[j]);
> - recover_orphan_inode(sbi, ino);
> + err = recover_orphan_inode(sbi, ino);
> + if (err) {
> + f2fs_put_page(page, 1);
> + clear_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_POR_DOING);
> + return err;
> + }
> }
> f2fs_put_page(page, 1);
> }
> /* clear Orphan Flag */
> clear_ckpt_flags(F2FS_CKPT(sbi), CP_ORPHAN_PRESENT_FLAG);
> clear_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_POR_DOING);
> - return;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static void write_orphan_inodes(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t start_blk)
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> index f18d31e..d0e9b70 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> @@ -1748,7 +1748,7 @@ int acquire_orphan_inode(struct f2fs_sb_info *);
> void release_orphan_inode(struct f2fs_sb_info *);
> void add_orphan_inode(struct f2fs_sb_info *, nid_t);
> void remove_orphan_inode(struct f2fs_sb_info *, nid_t);
> -void recover_orphan_inodes(struct f2fs_sb_info *);
> +int recover_orphan_inodes(struct f2fs_sb_info *);
> int get_valid_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *);
> void update_dirty_page(struct inode *, struct page *);
> void add_dirty_dir_inode(struct inode *);
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> index a79b6b5..4db5cd9 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> @@ -1245,7 +1245,9 @@ try_onemore:
> f2fs_join_shrinker(sbi);
>
> /* if there are nt orphan nodes free them */
> - recover_orphan_inodes(sbi);
> + err = recover_orphan_inodes(sbi);
> + if (err)
> + goto free_node_inode;
>
> /* read root inode and dentry */
> root = f2fs_iget(sb, F2FS_ROOT_INO(sbi));
> --
> 2.4.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists