| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <55CA4B1F.7030508@cumulusnetworks.com> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 15:21:03 -0400 From: Jonathan Toppins <jtoppins@...ulusnetworks.com> To: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org CC: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, Phil Jensen <pjensen@...rnote.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.2 000/110] 3.2.71-rc1 review On 08/10/2015 06:12 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.71 release. > There are 110 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed Aug 12 11:00:00 UTC 2015. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > A combined patch relative to 3.2.70 will be posted as an additional > response to this. A shortlog and diffstat can be found below. > Was thinking I would see upstream commit b6878d9e03043695dbf3fa1caa6dfc09db225b16, overlooked? Has been backported by at least Debian in their 3.2 kernel, version 3.2.68-1+deb7u3, to fix CVE-2015-5697. Maybe this upstream commit is too new and so it will show up in a later 3.2 stable version? Thanks, -Jon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists