[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150811033851.GA28533@kmo-pixel>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 19:38:51 -0800
From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Ming Lin <mlin@...nel.org>, axboe@...com,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
device-mapper development <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
Lars Ellenberg <drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com>,
Philip Kelleher <pjk1939@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
Ming Lin <ming.l@....samsung.com>,
Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
Geoff Levand <geoff@...radead.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jim Paris <jim@...n.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Dongsu Park <dpark@...teo.net>, drbd-user@...ts.linbit.com,
Joe Thornber <ejt@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/11] block: make generic_make_request handle
arbitrarily sized bios
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 10:41:55PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10 2015 at 10:00pm -0400,
> Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> > >>>>> "Ming" == Ming Lin <mlin@...nel.org> writes:
> >
> > Ming> Did you mean still use (UINT_MAX >> 9) in blkdev_issue_discard()?
> >
> > Ming> But that doesn't work for dm-thinp. See Kent's suggestion to use
> > Ming> 1<<31.
> >
> > I'm not sure why things are not working for dm-thinp. Presumably Kent's
> > code would split the discard at a granularity boundary so why would that
> > cause problems for dm?
>
> DM-thinp processes discards internally before it passes them down (if
> configured to do so). If a discard is smaller than the granularity of a
> thinp block (whose size is configurable) or if the start and end of the
> discard's extent is misaligned (relative to the thinp blocks mapped to
> the logical extent) then the discard won't actually discard partial
> thinp blocks.
This kind of logic really doesn't belong in dm - if it's needed, it really
belongs in bio_split() (which is supposed to work correctly for discards - so if
it is needed, then bio_split() needs fixing...)
IMO though it belongs in the driver - if a discard needs to be dropped because
it's too small and the hardware can't do it, that should be the driver's
responsibility.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists