[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55CAAA9F.70303@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 10:08:31 +0800
From: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@...wei.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC: "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"zhangliguang@...wei.com" <zhangliguang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mce: fix failed to reenable cmci when swiching to
interrupt mode
On 2015/8/12 2:52, Luck, Tony wrote:
>> Well, ok, but do it differently, please: rename
>> cmci_storm_disable_banks() to cmci_storm_switch_banks(bool on) which
>> turns them on and off. Unless Tony has a better suggestion...
>
> I like the boolean argument ... but not the "switch_banks" name. It sounds more
> like we are juggling between banks, rather than setting a switch/flag in a bank.
>
> How does "cmci_storm_set_cmci(bool on)" sound? Too many "cmci" in one name?
Thanks, I'll use this name.
--
Xie XiuQi
>
> -Tony
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists