[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1439376335-17895-5-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 11:45:29 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
To: Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Subject: [PATCH 04/10] mm, page_alloc: Remove unnecessary taking of a seqlock when cpusets are disabled
There is a seqcounter that protects against spurious allocation failures
when a task is changing the allowed nodes in a cpuset. There is no need
to check the seqcounter until a cpuset exists.
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
---
include/linux/cpuset.h | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/cpuset.h b/include/linux/cpuset.h
index 1b357997cac5..6eb27cb480b7 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpuset.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpuset.h
@@ -104,6 +104,9 @@ extern void cpuset_print_task_mems_allowed(struct task_struct *p);
*/
static inline unsigned int read_mems_allowed_begin(void)
{
+ if (!cpusets_enabled())
+ return 0;
+
return read_seqcount_begin(¤t->mems_allowed_seq);
}
@@ -115,6 +118,9 @@ static inline unsigned int read_mems_allowed_begin(void)
*/
static inline bool read_mems_allowed_retry(unsigned int seq)
{
+ if (!cpusets_enabled())
+ return false;
+
return read_seqcount_retry(¤t->mems_allowed_seq, seq);
}
--
2.4.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists