[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55CB3CCB.6020607@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 14:32:11 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>,
Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
CC: James Liao <jamesjj.liao@...iatek.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND..." <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] add GPT timer support for mt8173
On 08/11/2015 05:54 PM, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com> wrote:
>> This series add GPT timer support for mt8173. This is based on v4.2-rc1
>> and Matthias' next branch (for dts parts).
>>
>> The first 2 patches comes from 'Add SMP bringup support for mt65xx socs'
>> series [1]. I decide to move these 2 patches to this series, since it
>> is more relevent here. They are changed based on Matthias' and Daniel's
>> comments.
>>
>> [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mediatek/2015-May/000714.html
>>
>> Daniel Kurtz (1):
>> arm64: dts: mt8173: add timer node
>>
>> Yingjoe Chen (4):
>> clocksource: mediatek: do not enable GPT_CLK_EVT when setup
>> clocksource: mediatek: Use GPT as sched clock source
>> arm64: mediatek: enable MTK_TIMER
>> clk: mediatek: add 13mhz clock for MT8173
>
> Was this mediatek clocksource patch set get forgotten again?
Yep. Sounds like it felt at the wrong moment.
> All 5 patches have have been reviewed, and I think the ones that need
> it have been Ack'ed by Matthias and/or Stephen.
> What is the plan for merging them?
So if I am not wrong we have two patches I can take in my tree as a
couple of fixes (1 and 2), right ?
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists