lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPvkgC0DF5qkMgbVkgBZj8B3oyX47E5JUkr6nL+es-x5HJbK5A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 12 Aug 2015 17:22:18 +0100
From:	Steve Capper <steve.capper@...aro.org>
To:	David Long <dave.long@...aro.org>
Cc:	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.s.prabhu@...il.com>,
	William Cohen <wcohen@...hat.com>,
	"Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" <tixy@...aro.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
	Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 7/7] kprobes: Add arm64 case in kprobe example module

On 11 August 2015 at 01:52, David Long <dave.long@...aro.org> wrote:
> From: Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.s.prabhu@...il.com>
>
> Add info prints in sample kprobe handlers for ARM64
>
> Signed-off-by: Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.s.prabhu@...il.com>
> ---
>  samples/kprobes/kprobe_example.c | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

I'm not going through this series backwards, but I did run the kprobe
sample modules first, and nothing happened... (i.e. nothing fired).

The kernel usage of do_fork (which is used as an example by the sample
code) has been changed by:
3033f14a clone: support passing tls argument via C rather than pt_regs magic

Now everything appears to go through _do_fork rather than do_fork.

I'll send a fixup shortly, but if anyone else is running these modules
and worrying about a lack of events... worry less :-).

Cheers,
--
Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ