[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55CB7DE7.9060403@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 18:09:59 +0100
From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <Morten.Rasmussen@....com>
CC: "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"vincent.guittot@...aro.org" <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
"daniel.lezcano@...aro.org" <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
"yuyang.du@...el.com" <yuyang.du@...el.com>,
"mturquette@...libre.com" <mturquette@...libre.com>,
"rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Juri Lelli <Juri.Lelli@....com>,
"sgurrappadi@...dia.com" <sgurrappadi@...dia.com>,
"pang.xunlei@....com.cn" <pang.xunlei@....com.cn>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFCv5 PATCH 16/46] sched: Allocate and initialize energy data
structures
On 12/08/15 11:17, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 07:23:59PM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
>> @@ -6647,10 +6703,24 @@ static int __sdt_alloc(const struct cpumask *cpu_map)
[...]
>> @@ -6674,6 +6744,16 @@ static int __sdt_alloc(const struct cpumask *cpu_map)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> *per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sgc, j) = sgc;
>> +
>> + sge = kzalloc_node(sizeof(struct sched_group_energy) +
>> + nr_idle_states*sizeof(struct idle_state) +
>> + nr_cap_states*sizeof(struct capacity_state),
>> + GFP_KERNEL, cpu_to_node(j));
>> +
>> + if (!sge)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + *per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sge, j) = sge;
>> }
>> }
>>
>
> One more question, if fn() returns a full structure, why are we
> allocating and copying the thing? Its all const read only data, right?
>
Yeah, that's not strictly necessary. I could get rid of all the
allocation/copying/ and freeing code and just simply set sd->groups->sge
= fn(cpu) in init_sched_energy(). Plus delete the atomic_t ref in struct
sched_group_energy.
In this case, should I still keep the check_sched_energy_data() function
to verify that the scheduler got valid data via the struct
sched_domain_topology_level table from the arch, i.e. to make sure that
the per-cpu provided sd energy data is consistent for all cpus within
the sched group cpumask?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists