[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150812172418.GA6370@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 19:24:18 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>,
Ricky Zhou <rickyz@...omium.org>,
Julien Tinnes <jln@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] userns,pidns: Force thread group sharing, not
signal handler sharing
On 08/11, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> The code that places signals in signal queues computes the uids, gids,
> and pids at the time the signals are enqueued. Which means that tasks
> that share signal queues must be in the same pid and user namespaces.
>
> Sharing signal handlers is fine, but bizarre.
>
> So make the code in fork and userns_install clearer by only testing
> for what is functionally necessary.
>
> Also update the comment in unshare about unsharing a user namespace to
> be a little more explicit and make a little more sense.
>
> Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
But: Eric, Andrew, this means that
user_ns-use-correct-check-for-single-threadedness.patch
in -mm tree should be dropped.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists