[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALAqxLUxishMSb3A+PR_W0bSeFD9tWyETKM=Senk1_9A9GR2EA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 13:00:04 -0700
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To: Nathan Lynch <nathan_lynch@...tor.com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: VDSO: fix coarse clock monotonicity regression
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Nathan Lynch <nathan_lynch@...tor.com> wrote:
> Since 906c55579a63 ("timekeeping: Copy the shadow-timekeeper over the
> real timekeeper last") it has become possible on ARM to:
Apologies I didn't catch that the core change caused a regression for
ARM. Though fixing the ARM vdso logic in this way is a good idea to
avoid future problems.
> - Obtain a CLOCK_MONOTONIC_COARSE or CLOCK_REALTIME_COARSE timestamp
> via syscall.
> - Subsequently obtain a timestamp for the same clock ID via VDSO which
> predates the first timestamp (by one jiffy).
>
> This is because ARM's update_vsyscall is deriving the coarse time
> using the __current_kernel_time interface, when it should really be
> using the timekeeper object provided to it by the timekeeping core.
> It happened to work before only because __current_kernel_time would
> access the same timekeeper object which had been passed to
> update_vsyscall. This is no longer the case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Lynch <nathan_lynch@...tor.com>
> ---
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Add u32 cast to nsec calculation.
>
> arch/arm/kernel/vdso.c | 7 +++----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/vdso.c b/arch/arm/kernel/vdso.c
> index efe17dd9b921..54a5aeab988d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/vdso.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/vdso.c
> @@ -296,7 +296,6 @@ static bool tk_is_cntvct(const struct timekeeper *tk)
> */
> void update_vsyscall(struct timekeeper *tk)
> {
> - struct timespec xtime_coarse;
> struct timespec64 *wtm = &tk->wall_to_monotonic;
>
> if (!cntvct_ok) {
> @@ -308,10 +307,10 @@ void update_vsyscall(struct timekeeper *tk)
>
> vdso_write_begin(vdso_data);
>
> - xtime_coarse = __current_kernel_time();
> vdso_data->tk_is_cntvct = tk_is_cntvct(tk);
> - vdso_data->xtime_coarse_sec = xtime_coarse.tv_sec;
> - vdso_data->xtime_coarse_nsec = xtime_coarse.tv_nsec;
> + vdso_data->xtime_coarse_sec = tk->xtime_sec;
> + vdso_data->xtime_coarse_nsec = (u32)(tk->tkr_mono.xtime_nsec >>
> + tk->tkr_mono.shift);
> vdso_data->wtm_clock_sec = wtm->tv_sec;
> vdso_data->wtm_clock_nsec = wtm->tv_nsec;
Acked-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
thanks
-john
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists