[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <55CA9330.9070700@samsung.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 09:28:32 +0900
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
To: Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@...sung.com>,
rtc-linux@...glegroups.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
a.zummo@...ertech.it, alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com,
cw00.choi@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] rtc: s3c: enable/disable clocks for alarm
On 11.08.2015 20:28, Joonyoung Shim wrote:
> The clock enable/disable codes for alarm have removed from
What do you mean in this paragraph? The clock code was removing something?
> 'commit 24e1455493da ("drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c: delete duplicate clock
Remove the 'apostrophe.
> control")' and the clocks keep disabling even if alarm is set, so alarm
> interrupt can't happen.
...and the clocks are disabled even...
>
> The s3c_rtc_setaie function can be called several times with that
> enabled argument has same value,
...several times with 'enabled' argument having same value
> so it needs to check whether clocks is
> enabled or not.
s/is/are/
>
> Signed-off-by: Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@...sung.com>
Please add Cc-stable and fixes tag. To backport the patch probably
you'll have to remove the dependency on previous patches.
> ---
> drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c
> index abe2a6d..fce078c 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c
> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ struct s3c_rtc {
> void __iomem *base;
> struct clk *rtc_clk;
> struct clk *rtc_src_clk;
> + bool clk_enabled;
>
> struct s3c_rtc_data *data;
>
> @@ -71,9 +72,12 @@ static void s3c_rtc_enable_clk(struct s3c_rtc *info)
> unsigned long irq_flags;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&info->alarm_clk_lock, irq_flags);
> - clk_enable(info->rtc_clk);
> - if (info->data->needs_src_clk)
> - clk_enable(info->rtc_src_clk);
> + if (!info->clk_enabled) {
> + clk_enable(info->rtc_clk);
> + if (info->data->needs_src_clk)
> + clk_enable(info->rtc_src_clk);
> + info->clk_enabled = true;
> + }
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->alarm_clk_lock, irq_flags);
> }
>
> @@ -82,9 +86,12 @@ static void s3c_rtc_disable_clk(struct s3c_rtc *info)
> unsigned long irq_flags;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&info->alarm_clk_lock, irq_flags);
> - if (info->data->needs_src_clk)
> - clk_disable(info->rtc_src_clk);
> - clk_disable(info->rtc_clk);
> + if (info->clk_enabled) {
> + if (info->data->needs_src_clk)
> + clk_disable(info->rtc_src_clk);
> + clk_disable(info->rtc_clk);
> + info->clk_enabled = false;
> + }
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->alarm_clk_lock, irq_flags);
> }
>
> @@ -128,6 +135,11 @@ static int s3c_rtc_setaie(struct device *dev, unsigned int enabled)
>
> s3c_rtc_disable_clk(info);
>
> + if (enabled)
> + s3c_rtc_enable_clk(info);
> + else
> + s3c_rtc_disable_clk(info);
> +
> return 0;
> }
During probe the clk_enabled is false, so the clock won't be disabled at
the end of probe with s3c_rtc_disable_clk(). Maybe previous patch
interferes here so it would work after applying all 4 patches but not
when backporting. The patch in current form looks non-backportable.
Best regards,
KRzysztof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists