lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 12 Aug 2015 17:11:36 -0400
From:	Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To:	Boaz Harrosh <boaz@...xistor.com>
Cc:	"Wilcox\, Matthew R" <matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com>,
	"linda.knippers\@hp.com" <linda.knippers@...com>,
	"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-fsdevel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: regression introduced by "block: Add support for DAX reads/writes to block devices"

Boaz Harrosh <boaz@...xistor.com> writes:

> On 08/07/2015 11:41 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> <>
>> 
>>> We need to cope with the case where the end of a partition isn't on a
>>> page boundary though.
>> 
>> Well, that's usually done by falling back to buffered I/O.  I gave that
>> a try and panicked the box.  :)  I'll keep looking into it, but probably
>> won't have another patch until next week.
>> 
>
> lets slow down for a sec, please.
>
> We have all established that an unaligned partition start is BAD and not supported?

No.  Unaligned partitions on RAID arrays or 512e devices are bad because
they result in suboptimal performance.  They are most certainly still
supported, though.

-Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ