[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.20.1508131058380.7538@namei.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 10:59:19 +1000 (AEST)
From: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
cc: mcgrof@...il.com, zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, dwmw2@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] MODSIGN: Use PKCS#7 for module signatures [ver #8]
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, David Howells wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> Can you pull this into security/next please? Its aim is twofold: firstly,
> make the module signatures of PKCS#7/CMS format rather than a home-brewed
> format and secondly to pave the way for use of the signing code for
> firmware signatures (to follow later).
I'm still seeing these warnings:
scripts/sign-file.c: In function ‘main’:
scripts/sign-file.c:188: warning: value computed is not used
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_LICENSE() in
crypto/asymmetric_keys/pkcs7_test_key.o
--
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists