linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: cherryview: Serialize all register access

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150813124346.GC1541@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date:	Thu, 13 Aug 2015 15:43:46 +0300
From:	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: cherryview: Serialize all register access

On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 01:24:13PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Mika Westerberg
> <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > There is a hardware issue in Intel Braswell/Cherryview where concurrent
> > GPIO register access might results reads of 0xffffffff and writes might get
> > dropped.
> >
> > Prevent this from happening by taking the serializing lock for all places
> > where it is possible that more than one thread might be accessing the
> > hardware concurrently.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> Patch applied.

Thanks!

> When we are on the topic of this spinlock, I noticed that you
> take it in some IRQ functions:
> 
> static void chv_gpio_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d)
> {
>         struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
>         struct chv_pinctrl *pctrl = gpiochip_to_pinctrl(gc);
>         int pin = chv_gpio_offset_to_pin(pctrl, irqd_to_hwirq(d));
>         u32 intr_line;
> 
>         spin_lock(&pctrl->lock);
> (...)
> 
> The Realtime tree have recently started to push raw spinlocks
> into GPIO drivers that handle IRQs. Can you look into this
> for the Intel drivers, I think maybe this needs to be a raw
> spinlock to play nicely with realtime.
> 
> Cf:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-gpio&m=143749603401220&w=2

Sure, I'll look into that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/