linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] introduce __sb_{acquire,release}

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150813133744.GA16888@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 13 Aug 2015 15:37:45 +0200
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc:	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] introduce __sb_{acquire,release}_write() helpers

On 08/13, Jan Kara wrote:
>
> On Thu 13-08-15 15:17:44, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > so I agree with any naming, I'll update this patch... but perhaps
> > __sb_writers_acquire() without "_nowait" make more sense?
>
> OK, drop _nowait - maybe:
>
> __sb_writers_acquired()
>
> (note the additional 'd' at the end) to suggest that we already hold the lock
> and only want to tell lockdep about it?

Agreed! Will do in v3.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/