[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150813143332.GC26559@ulmo>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 16:33:33 +0200
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Have Tegra's GPIO chip depend explicitly on the
pinctrl device
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 10:29:53AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> Hello,
>
> these three patches make sure that there's an explicit dependency from
> the GPIO chip in Tegra SoCs to the corresponding pinctrl device, without
> having duplicated gpio ranges.
>
> By having an explicit dependency, we can do things such as probing the
> pinctrl device before the GPIO chip device to avoid deferred probes.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tomeu
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Don't defer probe if the pinctrl node is disabled
> - Remove outdated comment from the commit changelog
>
> Tomeu Vizoso (3):
> gpio: defer probe if pinctrl cannot be found
> pinctrl: tegra: Only set the gpio range if needed
> ARM: tegra: Add gpio-ranges property
Patches 2 and 3 applied to the Tegra tree. Linus, I've applied the
pinctrl patch to a separate branch, so we could use that to resolve
conflicts, should there be any.
Thierry
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists