[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150813144132.GC17375@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 16:41:32 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Boaz Harrosh <boaz@...xistor.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
"torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] allow mapping page-less memremaped areas into
KVA
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 04:23:38PM +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> > DAX as is is races against pmem unbind. A synchronization cost must
> > be paid somewhere to make sure the memremap() mapping is still valid.
>
> Sorry for being so slow, is what I asked. what is exactly "pmem unbind" ?
>
> Currently in my 4.1 Kernel the ioremap is done on modprobe time and
> released modprobe --remove time. the --remove can not happen with a mounted
> FS dax or not. So what is exactly "pmem unbind". And if there is a new knob
> then make it refuse with a raised refcount.
Surprise removal of a PCIe card which is mapped to provide non-volatile
memory for example. Or memory hot swap.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists