[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1439478658.7960.10.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 08:10:58 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...hat.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ipv4: off-by-one in continuation handling in
/proc/net/route
On Thu, 2015-08-13 at 11:21 +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> When generating /proc/net/route we emit a header followed by a line for
> each route. When a short read is performed we will restart this process
> based on the open file descriptor. When calculating the start point we
> fail to take into account that the 0th entry is the header. This leads
> us to skip the first entry when doing a continuation read.
>
> This can be easily seen with the comparison below:
>
> while read l; do echo "$l"; done </proc/net/route >A
> cat /proc/net/route >B
> diff -bu A B | grep '^[+-]'
>
> On my example machine I have approximatly 10KB of route output. There we
> see the very first non-title element is lost in the while read case,
> and an entry around the 8K mark in the cat case:
>
> +wlan0 00000000 02021EAC 0003 0 0 400 00000000 0 0 0
> -tun1 00C0AC0A 00000000 0001 0 0 950 00C0FFFF 0 0 0
>
> Fix up the off-by-one when reaquiring position on continuation.
>
> BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1483440
> Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
> ---
> net/ipv4/fib_trie.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> From code inspection I belive this was introduced by the Fixes
> below, but I have not tested this to confirm.
>
> Fixes: 8be33e955cb9 ("ipv4: off-by-one in continuation handling in /proc/net/route")
You probably meant
Fixes: 8be33e955cb9 ("fib_trie: Fib walk rcu should take a tnode and key instead of a trie and a leaf")
CC Alexander for review/comment
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists