[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1439484648.4818.13.camel@perches.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 09:50:48 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Igor Plyatov <plyatov@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
f.fainelli@...il.com, luwei.zhou@...escale.com,
richardcochran@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net,
u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de, Fabio.Estevam@...escale.com,
LW@...O-electronics.de, Frank.Li@...escale.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phy: workaround for buggy cable detection by
LAN8700 after cable plugging
On Thu, 2015-08-13 at 16:12 +0300, Igor Plyatov wrote:
> * Due to HW bug, LAN8700 sometimes does not detect presence of energy in the
> Ethernet cable in Energy Detect Power-Down mode (e.g while EDPWRDOWN bit is
> set, the ENERGYON bit does not asserted sometimes). This is a common bug of
> LAN87xx family of PHY chips.
> * The lan87xx_read_status() was improved to acquire ENERGYON bit. Its previous
> algorythm still not reliable on 100 % and sometimes skip cable plugging.
[]
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/smsc.c b/drivers/net/phy/smsc.c
[]
> @@ -104,10 +104,12 @@ static int lan911x_config_init(struct phy_device *phydev)
> static int lan87xx_read_status(struct phy_device *phydev)
> {
> int err = genphy_read_status(phydev);
> + int rc;
Is there a reason to move this declaration?
> + int i;
>
> if (!phydev->link) {
> /* Disable EDPD to wake up PHY */
> - int rc = phy_read(phydev, MII_LAN83C185_CTRL_STATUS);
> + rc = phy_read(phydev, MII_LAN83C185_CTRL_STATUS);
> if (rc < 0)
> return rc;
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists