[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55CCD5EC.8000509@sr71.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 10:37:48 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
To: Boaz Harrosh <boaz@...xistor.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
CC: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, axboe@...nel.dk, riel@...hat.com,
linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, mgorman@...e.de,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] allow mapping page-less memremaped areas into
KVA
On 08/13/2015 07:48 AM, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> There is already an object that holds a relationship of physical
> to Kernel-virtual. It is called a memory-section. Why not just
> widen its definition?
Memory sections are purely there to map physical address ranges back to
metadata about them. *Originally* for 'struct page', but widened a bit
subsequently. But, it's *never* been connected to kernel-virtual
addresses in any way that I can think of.
So, that's a curious statement.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists