[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150813175541.GA21103@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 19:55:41 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
arnd@...db.de, catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com,
ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp, monstr@...str.eu, jonas@...thpole.se,
cmetcalf@...hip.com, gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn, x86@...nel.org,
linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] dma-mapping: consolidate
dma_{alloc,free}_noncoherent
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 04:20:40PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > -/*
> > - * Dummy noncoherent implementation. We don't provide a dma_cache_sync
> > - * function so drivers using this API are highlighted with build warnings.
> > - */
>
> I'd like a similar comment to remain after this patch explaining that we
> don't support non-coherent allocations and that it'll be highlighted by
> the lack of dma_cache_sync, otherwise I'm sure we'll start to get patches
> to add the thing.
I'll keep a modified version of this comment in the ARM dma-mapping.h
in addition to an explanation near the new common dma_alloc_noncoherent
definition, thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists