[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4j=h1FULCnmLbwNv6E0ySyZNKniM3GZEnNCpGeiqCb+Kg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 14:20:33 -0700
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
linux390@...ibm.com, Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...marydata.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Omar Sandoval <osandov@...ndov.com>,
Boaz Harrosh <boaz@...xistor.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com>,
Ameen Ali <ameenali023@...il.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagig@...lanox.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Shaohua Li <shli@...com>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] pmem, dax: have direct_access use __pmem annotation
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Ross Zwisler
<ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> Update the annotation for the kaddr pointer returned by direct_access()
> so that it is a __pmem pointer. This is consistent with the PMEM driver
> and with how this direct_access() pointer is used in the DAX code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> Documentation/filesystems/Locking | 3 ++-
> arch/powerpc/sysdev/axonram.c | 7 ++++---
> drivers/block/brd.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/s390/block/dcssblk.c | 10 +++++----
> fs/block_dev.c | 2 +-
> fs/dax.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> include/linux/blkdev.h | 8 +++----
> 8 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/Locking b/Documentation/filesystems/Locking
> index 6a34a0f..06d4434 100644
> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/Locking
> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/Locking
> @@ -397,7 +397,8 @@ prototypes:
> int (*release) (struct gendisk *, fmode_t);
> int (*ioctl) (struct block_device *, fmode_t, unsigned, unsigned long);
> int (*compat_ioctl) (struct block_device *, fmode_t, unsigned, unsigned long);
> - int (*direct_access) (struct block_device *, sector_t, void **, unsigned long *);
> + int (*direct_access) (struct block_device *, sector_t, void __pmem **,
> + unsigned long *);
So this collides with the __pfn_t work. I think the we have a
reasonable chance of getting that in to 4.3, so I'd wait to see if we
hit any major roadblocks with that set [1] before merging these.
[1]: https://lists.01.org/pipermail/linux-nvdimm/2015-August/001803.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists