[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFxRbtQd372SKQYRKfkpZ+BSqj6EwdB96n+SqUaxJ-LXuA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 17:27:09 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Stas Sergeev <stsp@...t.ru>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Raymond Jennings <shentino@...il.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
Linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [regression] x86/signal/64: Fix SS handling for signals delivered
to 64-bit programs breaks dosemu
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Stas Sergeev <stsp@...t.ru> wrote:
>
> For example because you can as well do:
> prctl(ARCH_SET_SIGNAL_SS, 0)
> which will mean "restore ss in sighandler to its current value",
I really think a prctl() is the wrong thing to do.
If you want a signal handler to save/restore segments, I think it
should be a SA_xyz flag to sigaction() (the way we have SA_RESTART
etc). And off by default because of the obvious compatibility issues.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists