[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1439540944.2091.10.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 10:29:04 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: GCOV_PROFILE_ALL breaks BUILD_BUG_ON(!is_power_of_2(8))
+linux-kernel
> +#define DECLARE_EWMA(name, _factor, _weight)> > > > > \
> +> > struct ewma_##name {> > > > > > > \
> +> > > unsigned long internal;> > > > > > \
> +> > };> > > > > > > > > \
> +> > static inline void ewma_##name##_init(struct ewma_##name *e)> > \
> +> > {> > > > > > > > > \
> +> > > BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(_factor));> > > \
> +> > > BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(_weight));> > > \
> +> > > BUILD_BUG_ON(!is_power_of_2(_factor));> > > > \
> +> > > BUILD_BUG_ON(!is_power_of_2(_weight));> > > > \
>
So this seemed fine to me, but for some reason the compiler is saying
the BUILD_BUG_ON(!is_power_of_2(x)) fails, if and only if (!)
CONFIG_GCOV_PROFILE_ALL is enabled, which seems to boil down to the
compiler option -fprofile-arcs.
I'm going to replace this with just the code itself, i.e.
/* both must be a power of 2 */
BUILD_BUG_ON(_factor & (_factor - 1));
BUILD_BUG_ON(_weight & (_weight - 1));
but should I have expected this?
johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists