[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150814160828.GE29326@e105550-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 17:08:28 +0100
From: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
Dietmar Eggemann <Dietmar.Eggemann@....com>,
yuyang.du@...el.com, mturquette@...libre.com, rjw@...ysocki.net,
Juri Lelli <Juri.Lelli@....com>, sgurrappadi@...dia.com,
pang.xunlei@....com.cn, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFCv5 PATCH 01/46] arm: Frequency invariant scheduler
load-tracking support
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 11:27:54AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 07:23:44PM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> > +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(atomic_long_t, cpu_max_freq);
> > +DEFINE_PER_CPU(atomic_long_t, cpu_freq_capacity);
>
> > + atomic_long_set(&per_cpu(cpu_freq_capacity, cpu), capacity);
> > + unsigned long max = atomic_long_read(&per_cpu(cpu_max_freq, cpu));
> > + atomic_long_set(&per_cpu(cpu_max_freq, i), policy->max);
> > + unsigned long curr = atomic_long_read(&per_cpu(cpu_freq_capacity, cpu));
>
> The use of atomic_long_t here is entirely pointless.
Yes, I will get rid of those.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists