[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1439569394-11974-5-git-send-email-morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 17:23:12 +0100
From: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>
To: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com
Cc: vincent.guittot@...aro.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
Dietmar Eggemann <Dietmar.Eggemann@....com>,
yuyang.du@...el.com, mturquette@...libre.com, rjw@...ysocki.net,
Juri Lelli <Juri.Lelli@....com>, sgurrappadi@...dia.com,
pang.xunlei@....com.cn, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] sched/fair: Name utilization related data and functions consistently
From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Use the advent of the per-entity load tracking rewrite to streamline the
naming of utilization related data and functions by using
{prefix_}util{_suffix} consistently. Moreover call both signals
({se,cfs}.avg.util_avg) utilization.
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Signed-off-by: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 63be5a5..4cc3050 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -4825,31 +4825,32 @@ static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int target)
return target;
}
/*
- * get_cpu_usage returns the amount of capacity of a CPU that is used by CFS
+ * cpu_util returns the amount of capacity of a CPU that is used by CFS
* tasks. The unit of the return value must be the one of capacity so we can
- * compare the usage with the capacity of the CPU that is available for CFS
- * task (ie cpu_capacity).
+ * compare the utilization with the capacity of the CPU that is available for
+ * CFS task (ie cpu_capacity).
* cfs.avg.util_avg is the sum of running time of runnable tasks on a
* CPU. It represents the amount of utilization of a CPU in the range
- * [0..SCHED_LOAD_SCALE]. The usage of a CPU can't be higher than the full
- * capacity of the CPU because it's about the running time on this CPU.
+ * [0..SCHED_LOAD_SCALE]. The utilization of a CPU can't be higher than the
+ * full capacity of the CPU because it's about the running time on this CPU.
* Nevertheless, cfs.avg.util_avg can be higher than SCHED_LOAD_SCALE
* because of unfortunate rounding in util_avg or just
* after migrating tasks until the average stabilizes with the new running
- * time. So we need to check that the usage stays into the range
+ * time. So we need to check that the utilization stays into the range
* [0..cpu_capacity_orig] and cap if necessary.
- * Without capping the usage, a group could be seen as overloaded (CPU0 usage
- * at 121% + CPU1 usage at 80%) whereas CPU1 has 20% of available capacity
+ * Without capping the utilization, a group could be seen as overloaded (CPU0
+ * utilization at 121% + CPU1 utilization at 80%) whereas CPU1 has 20% of
+ * available capacity.
*/
-static int get_cpu_usage(int cpu)
+static int cpu_util(int cpu)
{
- unsigned long usage = cpu_rq(cpu)->cfs.avg.util_avg;
+ unsigned long util = cpu_rq(cpu)->cfs.avg.util_avg;
unsigned long capacity = capacity_orig_of(cpu);
- if (usage >= SCHED_LOAD_SCALE)
+ if (util >= SCHED_LOAD_SCALE)
return capacity;
- return (usage * capacity) >> SCHED_LOAD_SHIFT;
+ return (util * capacity) >> SCHED_LOAD_SHIFT;
}
/*
@@ -5941,7 +5942,7 @@ struct sg_lb_stats {
unsigned long sum_weighted_load; /* Weighted load of group's tasks */
unsigned long load_per_task;
unsigned long group_capacity;
- unsigned long group_usage; /* Total usage of the group */
+ unsigned long group_util; /* Total utilization of the group */
unsigned int sum_nr_running; /* Nr tasks running in the group */
unsigned int idle_cpus;
unsigned int group_weight;
@@ -6174,8 +6175,8 @@ static inline int sg_imbalanced(struct sched_group *group)
* group_has_capacity returns true if the group has spare capacity that could
* be used by some tasks.
* We consider that a group has spare capacity if the * number of task is
- * smaller than the number of CPUs or if the usage is lower than the available
- * capacity for CFS tasks.
+ * smaller than the number of CPUs or if the utilization is lower than the
+ * available capacity for CFS tasks.
* For the latter, we use a threshold to stabilize the state, to take into
* account the variance of the tasks' load and to return true if the available
* capacity in meaningful for the load balancer.
@@ -6189,7 +6190,7 @@ group_has_capacity(struct lb_env *env, struct sg_lb_stats *sgs)
return true;
if ((sgs->group_capacity * 100) >
- (sgs->group_usage * env->sd->imbalance_pct))
+ (sgs->group_util * env->sd->imbalance_pct))
return true;
return false;
@@ -6210,7 +6211,7 @@ group_is_overloaded(struct lb_env *env, struct sg_lb_stats *sgs)
return false;
if ((sgs->group_capacity * 100) <
- (sgs->group_usage * env->sd->imbalance_pct))
+ (sgs->group_util * env->sd->imbalance_pct))
return true;
return false;
@@ -6258,7 +6259,7 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env,
load = source_load(i, load_idx);
sgs->group_load += load;
- sgs->group_usage += get_cpu_usage(i);
+ sgs->group_util += cpu_util(i);
sgs->sum_nr_running += rq->cfs.h_nr_running;
if (rq->nr_running > 1)
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists