linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.1 68/84] md/raid1: extend spinlock to protect raid1_end_read

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20150814174212.270706436@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Fri, 14 Aug 2015 10:42:36 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.1 68/84] md/raid1: extend spinlock to protect raid1_end_read_request against inconsistencies

4.1-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>

commit 423f04d63cf421ea436bcc5be02543d549ce4b28 upstream.

raid1_end_read_request() assumes that the In_sync bits are consistent
with the ->degaded count.
raid1_spare_active updates the In_sync bit before the ->degraded count
and so exposes an inconsistency, as does error()
So extend the spinlock in raid1_spare_active() and error() to hide those
inconsistencies.

This should probably be part of
  Commit: 34cab6f42003 ("md/raid1: fix test for 'was read error from
  last working device'.")
as it addresses the same issue.  It fixes the same bug and should go
to -stable for same reasons.

Fixes: 76073054c95b ("md/raid1: clean up read_balance.")
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/md/raid1.c |   10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/md/raid1.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid1.c
@@ -1475,6 +1475,7 @@ static void error(struct mddev *mddev, s
 {
 	char b[BDEVNAME_SIZE];
 	struct r1conf *conf = mddev->private;
+	unsigned long flags;
 
 	/*
 	 * If it is not operational, then we have already marked it as dead
@@ -1494,14 +1495,13 @@ static void error(struct mddev *mddev, s
 		return;
 	}
 	set_bit(Blocked, &rdev->flags);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&conf->device_lock, flags);
 	if (test_and_clear_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags)) {
-		unsigned long flags;
-		spin_lock_irqsave(&conf->device_lock, flags);
 		mddev->degraded++;
 		set_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags);
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&conf->device_lock, flags);
 	} else
 		set_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&conf->device_lock, flags);
 	/*
 	 * if recovery is running, make sure it aborts.
 	 */
@@ -1567,7 +1567,10 @@ static int raid1_spare_active(struct mdd
 	 * Find all failed disks within the RAID1 configuration
 	 * and mark them readable.
 	 * Called under mddev lock, so rcu protection not needed.
+	 * device_lock used to avoid races with raid1_end_read_request
+	 * which expects 'In_sync' flags and ->degraded to be consistent.
 	 */
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&conf->device_lock, flags);
 	for (i = 0; i < conf->raid_disks; i++) {
 		struct md_rdev *rdev = conf->mirrors[i].rdev;
 		struct md_rdev *repl = conf->mirrors[conf->raid_disks + i].rdev;
@@ -1598,7 +1601,6 @@ static int raid1_spare_active(struct mdd
 			sysfs_notify_dirent_safe(rdev->sysfs_state);
 		}
 	}
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&conf->device_lock, flags);
 	mddev->degraded -= count;
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&conf->device_lock, flags);
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/