linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] x86 fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALCETrWRhq3T0Gdu0O-hYGzcrBXKZ=KKmA3Vd2YWV6ra5RccTg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 14 Aug 2015 12:14:17 -0700
From:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86 fixes

On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
>>
>> I think it's only slightly broken.
>>
>> This bit:
>>
>>         if ((FPU_CS & 4) != 4) {    /* Must be in the LDT */
>>             /* Can only handle segmented addressing via the LDT
>>                for now, and it must be 16 bit */
>>             printk("FPU emulator: Unsupported addressing mode\n");
>>             math_abort(FPU_info, SIGILL);
>>         }
>>
>>         code_descriptor = FPU_get_ldt_descriptor(FPU_CS);
>>
>> is buggy, but no buggier than the old code.
>
> That code seems fine to me (and explicitly errors out when it's not in
> the LDT). FPU_CS is actually the CS selector value.
>
> So testing that for being in the LDT by checking bit #2, and then
> using FPU_get_ldt_descriptor() on it actually seems *correct*.
>

By "buggy" I meant that it aborted if it was in the GDT but wasn't
flat.  This'll break if anyone does an emulated FP op on TLS data.

--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/