[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150814195956.GA16821@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 12:59:56 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Sven Joachim <svenjoac@....de>
Cc: Dick Snippe <Dick.Snippe@....nl>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CVE-2015-1805 and 3.14-longterm?
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 09:17:49PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2015-08-14 18:55 +0200, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 10:19:34AM +0200, Dick Snippe wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I'm sorry to bother you with this, but lwn.net reported a rather serious
> >> security issue a couple of weeks ago:
> >>
> >> http://lwn.net/Articles/646590/
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202855
> >> CVE-2015-1805
> >> "It was found that the Linux kernel's implementation of vectored pipe
> >> read and write functionality did not take into account the I/O vectors
> >> that were already processed when retrying after a failed atomic access
> >> operation, potentially resulting in memory corruption due to an I/O
> >> vector array overrun. A local, unprivileged user could use this flaw to
> >> crash the system or, potentially, escalate their privileges on the
> >> system."
> >>
> >> It appears that these upstream fixes haven't made it to 3.14.4[456]:
> >>
> >> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=f0d1bec9d58d4c038d0ac958c9af82be6eb18045
> >> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=637b58c2887e5e57850865839cc75f59184b23d1
> >>
> >> I'm just a (very happy!) user of the -longterm kernels, so I don't
> >> know how this normally works. But it would appear that this bug still
> >> exists in the -longterm kernels.
> >
> > I think, and I might be wrong here, but because
> > 637b58c2887e5e57850865839cc75f59184b23d1 (switch pipe_read() to
> > copy_page_to_iter()) is not in the 3.14-stable tree (it showed up in
> > 3.15), that f0d1bec9d58d4c038d0ac958c9af82be6eb18045 (new helper:
> > copy_page_from_iter()) isn't needed (it showed up in 3.16).
> >
> > So is this a problem in the 3.14-stable tree?
>
> It seems to have been fixed by 6b17faf3d5fa6a727c40613bdf24d73b2a59df27
> (pipe: iovec: Fix memory corruption when retrying atomic copy as
> non-atomic) in 3.14.46. That fix is also in 3.10.82.
Hey, even better, we fixed it and forgot all about it :)
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists