lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BLU436-SMTP1421419BB7C28F1301F6EF6C07B0@phx.gbl>
Date:	Sat, 15 Aug 2015 20:34:17 +0800
From:	"T. Zhou" <t.s.zhou@...mail.com>
To:	Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
CC:	mingo@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yuyang.du@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: sync with the cfs_rq when changing sched class

On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 01:24:12PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 08:59:02PM +0800, T. Zhou wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 02:55:55PM +0900, byungchul.park@....com wrote:
> > > +static void attach_entity_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
> > > +{
> > > +	se->avg.last_update_time = cfs_rq->avg.last_update_time;
> > > +	cfs_rq->avg.load_avg += se->avg.load_avg;
> > > +	cfs_rq->avg.load_sum += se->avg.load_sum;
> > > +	cfs_rq->avg.util_avg += se->avg.util_avg;
> > > +	cfs_rq->avg.util_sum += se->avg.util_sum;
> > > +}
> > 
> > I see this function is used in enqueue_entity_load_avg() also.
> > In tip tree code, enqueue_entity_load_avg() uses cfs_rq_clock_task()
> > as se->last_update_time in migration condition.
> > Here, you use cfs_rq->avg.last_update_time as se->last_update_time.
> > If se->last_update_time is different, next decay may be different too.
> > Just from inspecting code, maybe some reasonable there?
> 
> hello zhou,
> 
> update_cfs_rq_load_avg() would update cfs_rq->avg.last_update_time to now,
> which is returned from cfs_rq_clock_task(). :)
> 
> thanks,
> byungchul
> 

Hi Byungchul,

yes, you are right. se and cfs_rq update load avg at same time. :)

thanks
-- 
Tao
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ