linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 5/7] libnvdimm, e820: make CONFIG_X86_PMEM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 15 Aug 2015 17:58:46 +0200
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Boaz Harrosh <boaz@...xistor.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
	david <david@...morbit.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
	"torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/7] libnvdimm, e820: make CONFIG_X86_PMEM_LEGACY a
	tristate option

On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 08:28:35AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> I'm not grokking the argument against allowing this functionality to
> be modular.

You're adding a another layer of platform_devices just to make a tivially
small piece of code modular so that you can hook into it.  I don't think
that's a good reason, and neither is the after thought of preventing
potentially future buggy firmware.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/