[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150815124638.GG10304@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2015 14:46:38 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
Dietmar Eggemann <Dietmar.Eggemann@....com>,
yuyang.du@...el.com, mturquette@...libre.com, rjw@...ysocki.net,
Juri Lelli <Juri.Lelli@....com>, sgurrappadi@...dia.com,
pang.xunlei@....com.cn, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFCv5 PATCH 40/46] sched/cpufreq_sched: compute freq_new based
on capacity_orig_of()
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 07:24:23PM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_sched.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_sched.c
> index 2968f3a..7071528 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_sched.c
> @@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ void cpufreq_sched_set_cap(int cpu, unsigned long capacity)
> goto out;
>
> /* Convert the new maximum capacity request into a cpu frequency */
> - freq_new = capacity * policy->max >> SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT;
> + freq_new = (capacity * policy->max) / capacity_orig_of(cpu);
>
> /* No change in frequency? Bail and return current capacity. */
> if (freq_new == policy->cur)
Can't we avoid exporting that lot by simply passing in the right values
to begin with?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists