lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 14 Aug 2015 19:00:06 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
Cc:	tony@...mide.com, lgirdwood@...il.com, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, grygorii.strashko@...com,
	nsekhar@...com, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: pbias: use untranslated address to
 program pbias regulator

On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 04:54:09PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:

> vsel_reg and enable_reg of the pbias regulator descriptor should actually
> have the offset from syscon. However after the pbias device tree node

I'm having a hard time understanding this statement, sorry.  What makes
you say that they "shouild actually have the offset from syscon"?  What
is the problem that this is supposed to fix?

> is moved as a child node of syscon, vsel_reg and enable_reg has the
> absolute address because of the address translation that happens while
> creating device from device tree node.
> So avoid using platform_get_resource and use of_get_address in order to
> get only the offset (untranslated address) and populate these in
> vsel_reg and enable_reg.

This sounds like we're going in the wrong direction, we're moving from a
more generic API to a firmware specific one.  Why is this a good fix?

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ